MoviesNews

8 Forgotten Movies Turning 40 in 2026

In 1986, there were some absolute classics released that still get talked about and rewatched to this day, among them Stand by Me, The Fly, Aliens, and Blue Velvet. It’s probably unnecessary to go on about them, and all the other usual suspects, because if something has held up after 40 years, and people are still interested in 2026, then it’s a sign that, as a movie, it probably did something right. Actually, it probably did lots of things right.

Then there are the more obscure movies from 1986, some of them cult classics and remembered by a few people, and then if you go one step further down, you find the properly under-seen ones that very few people remember. Such films include the ones mentioned below, with some of them being quite good, and perhaps worthy of being remembered to a greater extent, and others being more understandably forgotten as time has gone on.

8

‘Final Take: The Golden Age of Movies’

Image via Shochiku

Final Take: The Golden Age of Movies is a love letter to Japanese cinema, specifically the 1930s, referred to by the title as a golden age in the same way that there’s also a Golden Age of Hollywood around the same time. It’s about a young woman who’s plucked from obscurity and finds herself surprisingly popular, as an actress, to the point where she seems like she could take the place of a more established actress who’s wrapped up in scandal.

You’re unsurprisingly best off knowing about classic Japanese cinema to get the most out of a movie like this, but it also works pretty well as a behind-the-scenes drama that’s nostalgic and pleasant at times, but a little more serious at other points. Final Take: The Golden Age of Movies isn’t particularly well-remembered or anything, and probably deserves to be a bit more well-known than it is.

7

‘Wise Guys’

Wise Guys - 1986 (2) Image via MGM Entertainment Co.

There was a book called Wiseguy that ended up being adapted for the screen as Goodfellas, and also a series of the same name (though not related) that aired from 1987 to 1990. Neither of these should be confused with Wise Guys, though, which is surprisingly obscure, considering the famous people involved, but, then again, maybe not surprisingly obscure because it’s also not great.

It’s a comedic gangster movie with more focus on comedy over crime, and a pretty infrequent rate of jokes that actually hit, which makes it a somewhat frustrating watch. It’s not abysmal, though, and sure, there aren’t any other farcical gangster movies that star the likes of Danny DeVito, Joe Piscopo, Harvey Keitel, and Dan Hedaya, all the while being directed by Brian De Palma. For that, there is inevitably a certain novelty value to this film’s sheer existence.

6

‘Sweet Liberty’

Sweet Liberty - 1986 Image via Universal Pictures

After M*A*S*H, Alan Alda was not in the short-lived AfterMASH, but he did direct a few movies of his own, after having directed episodes of M*A*S*H. Granted, his best directorial effort, The Four Seasons, came out when M*A*S*H was still on the air, but the more obscure Sweet Liberty was his first directorial effort post-M*A*S*H. It’s quite obscure, even though it has an impressive cast that includes Michael Caine, Michelle Pfeiffer, Bob Hoskins, and… *checks notes*…uh, Lillian Gish? As in the silent-era actress who was in The Birth of a Nation. Wild.

It’s one of those movies about making movies, and lots of things going wrong, with all the chaos played for laughs. Unfortunately, Sweet Liberty is not entirely funny, but it has its moments and is something of a curiosity, at least, a little like the aforementioned Wise Guys.

5

‘Gonza the Spearman’

With a title like Gonza the Spearman, you might expect this to be something of an action or martial arts/samurai movie, but that’s not really the case. Action is minimal, because this is more of a period drama about the titular character being engaged to marry into one family, but then also pledging to marry into another, and then when this becomes widely known, drama/conflict ensues.

It ends up being very patiently-paced and low-key, albeit certainly getting grim and heavy when it wants to be. Gonza the Spearman was a later film directed by Masahiro Shinoda, who was probably best known for his Japanese New Wave movies from the 1960s. Sure, none of them were blockbusters, but the likes of Pale Flower (1964) and Double Suicide (1969) are minor classics, or at least a bit more well-known within Japanese cinema.

4

‘Doraemon: Nobita and the Steel Troops’

A boy on the floor looking confused
Doraemon_ Nobita and the Steel Troops – 1986
Image via Shin-Ei Animation

There are people to whom the Doraemon movies are childhood classics, or otherwise very nostalgic, so if you’re in that camp, apologies for the suggestion here that one of the movies in the series is forgotten. It’s more in the overall scheme of things that the series is obscure, or at least an oddity outside Japan, and then even if you’re aware of the films, maybe individual ones get overshadowed because the series is so massive.

See also  Snoop Dogg Questions LQBTQ+ Representation in Kid's Movies

Doraemon: Nobita and the Steel Troops plays around with some pretty out-there sci-fi concepts for a kid’s movie (including a mirror world/parallel dimension sort of thing), and it’s all quite creative.

Doraemon goes beyond just movies, but there’s been one per year, on average (just about) for nearly half a century now, so Doraemon: Nobita and the Steel Troops is just one of many. It plays around with some pretty out-there sci-fi concepts for a kid’s movie (including a mirror world/parallel dimension sort of thing), and it’s all quite creative, really feeling like it was written and put together by a group of kids who just so happen to be pretty darn good animators.

3

‘Millionaires’ Express’

The Millionaires' Express - 1986 Image via Golden Harvest

Directed by and starring Sammo Hung, who’s likely a familiar name to anyone who’s more than a casual fan of martial arts movies, Millionaires’ Express isn’t the sort of thing that’s particularly popular unless you’re, again, quite into martial arts movies. This is one of Sammo Hung’s best movies, though, and if Jackie Chan had appeared in it in either a supporting or just a cameo role (he often did one or the other in various other Sammo Hung movies), then Millionaires’ Express might well be a little more famous.

As it stands, though, it’s a fun and kind of chaotic martial arts comedy that involves a whole bunch of unusual and sometimes shady characters clashing on board a train, and then further clashes happening once that train reaches a small town. Millionaires’ Express also feels like a bit of a Western on top of an action/comedy movie, and it’s pretty entertaining stuff, especially in its final act, which is where most of the best action sequences are saved for.

2

‘Dead End Drive-In’

Dead End Drive-In - 1986 Image via New World Pictures

As a dystopian movie, Dead End Drive-In might not be perfect, but it scores more than a few points as far as sheer creativity is concerned. It’s also about exploitation movies, kind of, all the while sort of being an exploitation/grindhouse movie, or at least a B-movie. True to its title, it’s about a drive-in cinema with a secret, and how two people get trapped there, all the while struggling to break out.

That keeps things just vague enough, because what Dead End Drive-In really ends up going for is entirely unique, and equal parts surprising and baffling. And, though it’s old, it’s also a bit niche, even by the standards of cult movies, so spoiling it still feels possible, and something worth frowning upon. If you’re after a particularly weird Australian movie (which is saying a lot, since most Australian movies are already a bit weird) that’ll take you for a ride, that’s what you get here.

1

‘Parting Glances’

Parting Glances - 1986 Image via Cinecom Pictures

10 years on from Parting Glances, Steve Buscemi starred in another dramedy that’s a good deal more obscure than it deserves to be, called Trees Lounge, which he directed. He was only an actor, though, in Parting Glances, playing a young man with AIDS, while the other two main characters are a gay couple, and one of them still had complicated feelings about Buscemi’s character.

It’s surprising, maybe, that Parting Glances is a dramedy instead of being a direct drama, since the subject matter is undeniably heavy, and even heavier in 1986, considering that was back when an AIDS diagnosis was fatal. And then there’s further sadness regarding Parting Glances, because its director, Bill Sherwood, died from AIDS-related complications just a few years after Parting Glances was released, and it was his sole feature film, as director. But the film itself has endured well, being noteworthy today for very much capturing the era of – and struggles surrounding – the AIDS, pandemic, all the while giving Buscemi something of a breakout starring role.































































Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

🐦Birdman

🪙No Country for Old Men

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





See also  Get Ready for 2026: 15 New Movies We Think Everyone Will Be Talking About

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





See also  All 10 Paul Thomas Anderson Movies, Ranked by Entertainment Value

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.


Source link

Digit

Digit is a versatile content creator with expertise in Health, Technology, Movies, and News. With over 7 years of experience, he delivers well-researched, engaging, and insightful articles that inform and entertain readers. Passionate about keeping his audience updated with accurate and relevant information, Digit combines factual reporting with actionable insights. Follow his latest updates and analyses on DigitPatrox.
Back to top button
close