Google’s Pixel pricing puzzle
If you look back over the 7,792 years I’ve been obsessing over this area, you’ll see that my typical stance has been that the Pixel “a” phones are usually the most advisable options for most people — those who want an exceptional all-around Android experience, including near-instant ongoing software updates for a full seven years, but don’t care enough about the finer points (the most premium materials, the absolute best camera setup imaginable, and so on) to justify the added expense of the top-of-the-line alternative.
But when the difference between the two tiers is 50 bucks? Even a hundred — or $150? At a certain point, if you can justify the relatively small contrast in cost, it seems almost silly not to go with the best of the best.
If the Pixel 9a were still priced around $350 to $400, as those earlier midrange models were — or if we lived in a world where the regular Pixel 9 weren’t so frequently on such significant sales — the 9a would be a no-brainer. Like before, it’d be the best entry point into the most compelling all-around Android experience, particularly for anyone focused on value, working with a limited budget, or just not especially interested in the top-of-the-line niceties some of us appreciate.
Source link
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
